I met with a friend, Sally, to do
my mock Creative Arts Therapy Session. To make the process a bit more
structured and formal I invited her over to my apartment at a set date and
time, set in advance, and had the work space already set for when she arrived. Sally
and I met in undergrad where she completed a minor in Scenic Design. She went
on to get her Masters in graphic Design at Pratt and routinely sketches and watercolors
as some of her favorite hobbies. As such, I wasn’t too concerned with ensuring
success on this first visit. Knowing that she is a very capable artist I felt I
could give her a more challenging prompt than I would have normally. What I
didn’t realize, however, was that at times her artistic skillset and design
background would be a disservice to her.
Wanting to
ensure that Sally felt like she had plenty of choices I made sure to present
her with a multitude of materials. I had assorted sizes, types and colors of
paper. In additional I had rubber cement glue, Elmers school glue, scotch tape,
scissors, magic markers, colored pencils, water colors, crayons, oil pastels,
stickers and much more. I also decided to give Sally the choice of which
directive she wanted to focus on for the session allowing her to choose between
“Make an image that either tells a story, expresses a feeling, allows you to
be/meditate/play with the materials or depicts a relationship” or “Decorate
this box as a representation of you paying attention to the inside, outside and
boundaries.” Sally chose the latter exclaiming “I love little boxes” and
rushing to get started.
Almost
instantly Sally stated “I wish you had glitter.” At first, I must admit, I felt
a little annoyed. After all of the effort I had put in to digging up any and
all of my creative supplies she had to want what felt like the only thing I
didn’t have. I apologized for not having glitter and encouraged her to do the
best she could with the materials that were available to her. For a bit longer
we sat in silence. Noticing my eyes on her she said “Don’t look at me.” Being
friends we both laughed at the awkwardness of my watching her decorate a box as
I sat observing. “You don’t have to just
watch me,” she stated, “you can do something else.” “Well, actually, I think it’s best if I don’t
draw with you because I want to be able to see what you’re doing. This is about
your experience, not mine” I responded.
“Well you don’t have to draw, you can read or something, I don’t care”
she replied. “I think I’d prefer to just watch what you’re doing, this is your
time.”
I continued
to watch as Sally worked on her box. I felt too uncomfortable commenting as she
worked being that she seemed so focused, I did not want to distract her.
Instead, I made mental notes as she went. I noticed how she vigorously colored
the bottom inside of the box with a yellow colored pencil. She looked at
disappointingly after and stated out loud but to herself “This was supposed to
be yellow.” Though I knew the comment wasn’t to me I felt tempted to offer
advice. Perhaps she didn’t realize the watercolors might work nicely on the
box, or that the oil pastels might work better. Ultimately I held back, both
intimidated by the fact that she is a better artist than me and not wanting to
get to in the way of her process.
I continued
to watch Sally work until eventually she peeked up and asked “Um, how long do I
have to work on this? You should give me a time or I’ll work on this forever.”
I was so sucked in watching her work I hadn’t even thought of giving her a set
time. I apologized for the oversight and told her we could work on the box for
twenty more minutes, asking her if that felt ok. She said that was fine. Part
of me was sad to restrict her and curious to see where her design would go with
unlimited time. However, wanting to leave time for discussion I knew that
setting some parameter was necessary.
Toward the
end of the project I noticed Sally turn the box over. She looked at the barcode
sticker, picked at it for a second, then looked up at me before putting the box
back down. I felt silly for not having taken the sticker off first and wondered
what that communicated and what was going on in her head. Instead of commenting
in the moment I made a mental note of it for discussion at the end. Shortly after Sally declared “Ok I’m done”
before scrambling to add a few more details while saying “No, wait” and then
quickly stating that she was done once again.
To begin
our discussion about the piece I first asked Sally what she thought the focal
point or the center of the piece was. “The center is what’s in the center. This
eye.” I asked her to briefly explain what the piece elicited in her, what was
going on in the piece for her. “Well, as I understood the assignment it’s
supposed to be about me. So, it’s me. It’s about how I view the world and
process what I see.” With this idea of
processing in mind I assumed the piece had a sort of motion to it. I asked her
what she thought the motion was however she seemed a bit stumped. To help her,
I reminded her that on the inside of the box she had drawn a circular motion on
the bottom and had drawn a series of lines from bottom to top on the inside
wall of the box. “Well, I guess the motion starts outside. So, like, I see
these things in the world that I take in and that become part of me. And there
are other ways that I can take stuff in, like through these windows (Sally pointed to various shapes on the
outside wall of the box) but some stuff gets in and other stuff doesn’t and
that’s the way it is. So I drew the shaped like one of those kids toys where
only the right shape goes through.”
To clarify
and reflect back what I had heard I repeated this idea of things in the outside
world being absorbed by the eye and windows and internalized. “Yes,” she
stated. “So the motion is kind of going from outside in?” I asked. “Well, it’s
coming in but stuff is also going out. Like some of the stuff comes in and just
stays there and other stuff comes in and effects what I then put back into the
world,” Sally shared. “So it’s sort of bi-directional” I wondered. “Yeah,” Sally
answered.
“So, these
shapes on the side of the box are meant to be windows?” I asked. Sally confirmed that they were leading me to
wonder if she had contemplated using the scissors to create real passageways.
“Uh, no. No, I didn’t think about using the scissors” Sally confirmed. “So, in a way, even the passages that are
supposed to let stuff through are still blocked,” I stated. Sally hesitated and
then stated” Yeah, yeah I guess they are. But, I wouldn’t read too much into
that. I didn’t plan that.” “So the rest of it you did plan?” I asked. Sally
said that she had. I explained to her that sometimes powerful things can come
up when we allow ourselves not to think. “I can’t not think, I’m a designer. I
visualize in advance.”
Wanting to
continue moving forward I began to talk through the steps Sally had taken in
decorating her box to elicit more conversation, making statements about various
observations I had made. Sally nodded and agreed as I went, occasionally adding
a comment here or there before eventually asking “Are you just going to say
what I did?” I told her yes, and explained to her that her box was about her
and that I didn’t want to impose any of my own assumptions or interpretations
onto her.
I mentioned
her persistence in getting the bottom of the box yellow and asked why it was so
important to her to have the bottom of the box be visibly yellow. “I just
wanted to have it go from darker to lighter colors so that the center could be
white.” I probed her and she explained that it tied into the idea of
processing. Everything she takes in gets processed and filtered and maybe some
of it gets put back out.”
Nearing the
end of our time I commented on her leaving the lid of the box on. “That’s the
only way it works,” she stated “If the lid isn’t on the mechanism doesn’t work.”
I wondered “Well, if the only way the mechanism works is with the lid on, did
you consider taping or gluing the lid on permanently so that it always works?” “No,
I didn’t think of that,” she replied.
To wrap
things up I reminded Sally about how desperately she had wanted glitter at the
beginning of the project. I asked her how she felt when I didn’t have glitter. “Disappointed”
she replied “but it was okay.” We explored what she would have done with the
glitter had she had it and what she did to compensate for not having it. I
asked her what her experiences was doing the mock session “I mean, it made
think about things I kind of already knew about myself but made me think about
them in a different way-- but, nothing life changing. I don’t think I’ll go
home and like cry tonight.” I told her that just the fact it made her think in
a different way seemed victory enough for me.
If I could go back and redo the mock session I would choose a different, more introductory directive. Doing so may have helped to break down Sally's habits of thinking so much while making art. Giving her what felt like a more advanced directive, one meant for a little further in the therapeutic relationship, allowed her to stay in this highly design centered place. However, I was very pleased to hear that the experience made her think. If we were to meet again I would further explore her "blocked" windows and the lid she left on her box.
Great mock session. It sounds like you did a good job sitting with her discomfort and giving her the space for something new to be discovered. Your assessment of the her use of the materials, as a professional designer, was good. Because she was a friend, do you think any expectations of your daily relationship were played out in the request for and disappointing in not having the glitter? This was a rich session!
ReplyDelete